Miscellaneous Performance Metrics

This section looks at some of the other commonly used benchmarks representative of the performance of specific real-world applications.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15

We use CINEBENCH R15 for 3D rendering evaluation. The program provides three benchmark modes - OpenGL, single threaded and multi-threaded. Evaluation of different PC configurations in all three modes provided us the following results.

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - Single Thread

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - Multiple Threads

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15 - OpenGL

The results track what was observed in the media and entertainment category workloads in SPECworkstation 3.

x265 Benchmark

Next up, we have some video encoding benchmarks using x265 v2.8. The appropriate encoder executable is chosen based on the supported CPU features. In the first case, we encode 600 1080p YUV 4:2:0 frames into a 1080p30 HEVC Main-profile compatible video stream at 1 Mbps and record the average number of frames encoded per second.

Video Encoding - x265 - 1080p

Our second test case is 1200 4K YUV 4:2:0 frames getting encoded into a 4Kp60 HEVC Main10-profile video stream at 35 Mbps. The encoding FPS is recorded.

Video Encoding - x265 - 4K 10-bit

The Ghost Canyon NUC surprisingly performs better than systems equipped with CPUs sporting much higher TDPs.

7-Zip

7-Zip is a very effective and efficient compression program, often beating out OpenCL accelerated commercial programs in benchmarks even while using just the CPU power. 7-Zip has a benchmarking program that provides tons of details regarding the underlying CPU's efficiency. In this subsection, we are interested in the compression and decompression rates when utilizing all the available threads for the LZMA algorithm.

7-Zip LZMA Compression Benchmark

7-Zip LZMA Decompression Benchmark

Given the brief nature of the benchmark workload and the large number of available threads, it is no surprise that the Ghost Canyon NUC performs significantly better than the rest of the systems in this workload.

Cryptography Benchmarks

Cryptography has become an indispensable part of our interaction with computing systems. Almost all modern systems have some sort of hardware-acceleration for making cryptographic operations faster and more power efficient. In this sub-section, we look at two different real-world applications that may make use of this acceleration.

BitLocker is a Windows features that encrypts entire disk volumes. While drives that offer encryption capabilities are dealt with using that feature, most legacy systems and external drives have to use the host system implementation. Windows has no direct benchmark for BitLocker. However, we cooked up a BitLocker operation sequence to determine the adeptness of the system at handling BitLocker operations. We start off with a 2.5GB RAM drive in which a 2GB VHD (virtual hard disk) is created. This VHD is then mounted, and BitLocker is enabled on the volume. Once the BitLocker encryption process gets done, BitLocker is disabled. This triggers a decryption process. The times taken to complete the encryption and decryption are recorded. This process is repeated 25 times, and the average of the last 20 iterations is graphed below.

BitLocker Encryption Benchmark

BitLocker Decryption Benchmark

The BitLocker benchmark results are a bit surprising, particularly given the clear performance benefits of the Core i9-9980HK for cryptography applications in the other applications below.

Creation of secure archives is best done through the use of AES-256 as the encryption method while password protecting ZIP files. We re-use the benchmark mode of 7-Zip to determine the AES256-CBC encryption and decryption rates using pure software as well as AES-NI. Note that the 7-Zip benchmark uses a 48KB buffer for this purpose.

7-Zip AES256-CBC Encryption Benchmark

7-Zip AES256-CBC Decryption Benchmark

As expected, the 8C/16T configuration allows for fast encryption and decryption irrespective of the use of pure software or AES-NI instructions.

Yet another cryptography application is secure network communication. OpenSSL can take advantage of the acceleration provided by the host system to make operations faster. It also has a benchmark mode that can use varying buffer sizes. We recorded the processing rate for a 8KB buffer using the hardware-accelerated AES256-CBC-HAC-SHA1 feature.

OpenSSL Encryption Benchmark

OpenSSL Decryption Benchmark

These results are not surprising given the core count and operating frequency profile of the CPU in the Ghost Canyon NUC.

Agisoft Photoscan

Agisoft PhotoScan is a commercial program that converts 2D images into 3D point maps, meshes and textures. The program designers sent us a command line version in order to evaluate the efficiency of various systems that go under our review scanner. The command line version has two benchmark modes, one using the CPU and the other using both the CPU and GPU (via OpenCL). We present the results from our evaluation using the CPU mode only. The benchmark (v1.3) takes 84 photographs and does four stages of computation:

  • Stage 1: Align Photographs (capable of OpenCL acceleration)
  • Stage 2: Build Point Cloud (capable of OpenCL acceleration)
  • Stage 3: Build Mesh
  • Stage 4: Build Textures

We record the time taken for each stage. Since various elements of the software are single threaded, and others multithreaded, it is interesting to record the effects of CPU generations, speeds, number of cores, and DRAM parameters using this software.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 1

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 3

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 4

The Ghost Canyon NUC is better than any of the other considered systems across all Photoscan stages.

Dolphin Emulator

Wrapping up our application benchmark numbers is the new Dolphin Emulator (v5) benchmark mode results. This is again a test of the CPU capabilities.

Dolphin Emulator Benchmark

In fact, the 249s taken by the Ghost Canyon NUC is the fastest amongst all SFF PCs we have evaluated with this benchmark.

SPECworkstation 3 Benchmark GPU Performance - Gaming Workloads
Comments Locked

109 Comments

View All Comments

  • fazalmajid - Sunday, April 19, 2020 - link

    Yes. I wish they made the Mini in 3950X. If they can support the i9-9900K in the EliteDesk 800 G5 chassis (95W TDP), they should be able to support the 3950X as well, instead of the feeble Ryzen 5 that line tops out at.
  • Namisecond - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    AMD may not be able to meet the OEM demand for their 8-core and 16 core processors, whereas the 9900K may be plentiful.
  • fazalmajid - Sunday, April 19, 2020 - link

    I just got a HP EliteDesk 800 G5 with an i7-9700K and 64GB RAM, uncompromised 95W TDP in a smaller form factor (it’s for software development, so I don’t care about the GPU). You can even configure it with an i9-9900K and dual M.2 SSDs. It’s actually the fastest computer I own:

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1826503

    https://browser.geekbench.com/user/122632
  • henryjin - Sunday, April 19, 2020 - link

    Surprised no mention here of the Velka 3 (https://www.velkase.com/products/velka-3) - full mini-ITX motherboard, flex-ATX power supply, and dual slot ITX graphics card in < 4 L.
  • zodiacfml - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    Weren't for Intel's NUCs being pricey
  • sjkpublic@gmail.com - Monday, April 20, 2020 - link

    $1600? Really? Please give me a CPU without the spectre/meltdown microcode fixes and I may pay $500 for a NUC.
  • mikato - Tuesday, May 5, 2020 - link

    I see some neat boutique cases mentioned in comments that I haven't heard of before, but what about SFF cases that don't have support or more space for a discrete graphics card? I know that doesn't really match this review, but I'm interested in an SFF for an HTPC using integrated graphics. I don't think we need or want discrete graphics for watching TV.

    Also, I'll mention I only saw 3 lines of text from the article initially when going to a new article page. That bottom horizontal ad is huge. Come on.
  • tygrus - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    The Baseboard acts more like a PCIe riser connecting the ECE to the 3 slots sharing the 16 lanes (x16 or X8 + x4 + x4 NVMe).
  • itsratso - Wednesday, July 29, 2020 - link

    still waiting for the ability to power your computer on and off with my remote. you know like EVERY OTHER PIECE OF HT EQUIPMENT ON EARTH

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now