NVIDIA Announces RTX A2000 Video Card: Low Profile & Low Power for ProViz
by Ryan Smith on August 10, 2021 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
- NVIDIA
- Quadro RTX
- Ampere
As part of a suite of SIGGRAPH-related announcements, NVIDIA this morning is announcing a new addition to their RTX line of professional video cards, the RTX A2000. Following NVIDIA’s transitional top-to-bottom product rollouts, the latest member of NVIDIA’s pro GPU lineup is the smallest and cheapest card yet, thanks in large part to its use of NVIDIA’s GA106 GPU. Paired with 6GB of VRAM and aimed in part at small form factor workstations, NVIDIA expects the card to go on sale in October.
Though a relative lightweight compared to the far more powerful RTX A6000, the A2000 is an interesting (and in some ways much delayed) development in NVIDIA’s professional visualization product stack. Despite the fact that NVIDIA has been shipping ray tracing-capable hardware for almost 3 years now, the company has never previously released a mid-range ProViz card with that kind functionality – the previous-generation Quadro RTX stack stopped at the RTX 4000, and below that, everything has remained RT-free. And though this is ultimately based on the fact that NVIDIA only put RT hardware in their higher-end Turing GPUs, the end result is the same: this is NVIDIA's first RT-capable mid-range pro card.
NVIDIA Professional Visualization Card Specification Comparison |
||||||
A6000 | A5000 | A4000 | A2000 | |||
CUDA Cores | 10752 | 8192 | 6144 | 3328 | ||
Tensor Cores | 336 | 256 | 192 | 104 | ||
Boost Clock | 1800MHz | 1695MHz | 1560MHz | 1200MHz | ||
Memory Clock | 16Gbps GDDR6 | 16Gbps GDDR6 | 14Gbps GDDR6 | 12Gbps GDDR6 |
||
Memory Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit | 256-bit | 192-bit | ||
VRAM | 48GB | 24GB | 16GB | 6GB | ||
ECC | Partial (DRAM) |
Partial (DRAM) |
Partial (DRAM) |
Partial (DRAM) |
||
Single Precision | 38.7 TFLOPS | 27.8 TFLOPS | 19.2 TFLOPS | 8 TFLOPS | ||
Tensor Performance | 309.7 TFLOPS | 222.2 TFLOPS | 153.4 TFLOPS | 63.9 TFLOPS | ||
TDP | 300W | 230W | 140W | 70W | ||
Cooling | Active | Active | Active | Active | ||
NVLink | 1x NVLink3 112.5GB/sec |
1x NVLink3 112.5GB/sec |
N/A | N/A | ||
GPU | GA102 | GA102 | GA104 | GA106 | ||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere | Ampere | Ampere | ||
Manufacturing Process | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | Samsung 8nm | ||
Launch Price | N/A | N/A | N/A | $450 | ||
Launch Date | 12/2020 | 04/2021 | 04/2021 | 10/2021 |
Fittingly, it’s also the first RTX card released by NVIDIA that’s available in a low-profile design. Thanks to NVIDIA significantly turning down the GA106 GPU’s clockspeeds, the RTX A2000 has a TDP of just 70 watts. This keeps the heat generated by the card low enough that it can be cooled by a dual-slot low-profile cooler – making it suitable for use in true small form factor workstations – albeit at the cost of capping the card’s overall performance.
Digging down into the specifications, what we find is a GA106-based video card with a few SMs disabled and a relatively low boost clockspeed of just 1200MHz. On paper, this gives the card roughly 8 TFLOPS of single precision (FP32) graphics and compute performance. Or, tapping into the card’s 104 tensor cores, it can wring out almost 64 TFLOPS of performance with tensor operations.
This is backed by 6GB of GDDR6 memory, sitting on top of a 192-bit memory bus. Like the GPU clockspeed, NVIDIA is keeping the memory clockspeed on the low side as well (presumably again for power reasons), resulting in a memory clockspeed of 12Gbps. Thankfully, the wider memory bus offsets this somewhat, putting the final memory bandwidth at a respectable 288GB/second. Meanwhile, as this is a ProViz card, like the rest of the RTX A series the A2000 offers optional ECC memory support in the form of soft ECC.
Past that, the diminutive video card’s claim to fame is its small size. As previously mentioned, this is NVIDIA’s first low-profile ProViz card in a while, and is aimed in part at small form factor workstations. With a 70W TDP, the card still requires a decent bit of cooling, so NVIDIA has essentially split the difference and gone with a double-wide card design in the form of a low-profile blower. So RTX A2000 is neither silent nor quite small enough to go into truly tiny machines, but SFF boxes that can provide the necessary slots should have little trouble accommodating the card. Meanwhile, though not shown off in any of the pictures NVIDIA has provided, the RTX A2000 is designed to go into standard (full height) PCs as well, so there will also be a full profile bracket available for the card.
Finally, owing to the small size of the card, NVIDIA has switched to Mini DisplayPort 1.4a connectors for this card. MiniDP gives the card the same display capabilities as the other A-series cards – driving up to 4 5K displays – just without the convenience of using the same full-size DP connector as the rest of the family.
Wrapping things up, NVIDIA expects the RTX A2000 to be available through the company’s usual retail and OEM partners in October. The card will be priced at around $450.
Source: NVIDIA
33 Comments
View All Comments
29a - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link
You forgot telephones or does that not fit the narrative you're trying to create.meacupla - Tuesday, August 10, 2021 - link
Let me give you a spoiler for RX 6600XTOverpriced for something that's only capable of 1080p gaming.
Samus - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link
What a waste of bandwidth.chrysrobyn - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link
Anandtech figured out that none of the GPU news actually matters when consumers can't actually buy them. Might as well cover professional as much as consumer.29a - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link
I'm with you OP AMD gets fucked on a lot of releases on this site and I don't even like AMD video cards.catavalon21 - Thursday, August 12, 2021 - link
The last GPU "reviewed" here was AMD. The Radeon 5600 XT.Samus - Thursday, August 12, 2021 - link
:mic drop:inighthawki - Wednesday, August 11, 2021 - link
As an enthusiast, I do more than just gaming and this article is of great interest to me. So speak for yourself.And as others have said, if you dont care about the article, then don't read it. Ryan and the rest of the AT team has zero obligation to cater to what good ol' Frumious1 wants and nothing more.
catavalon21 - Thursday, August 12, 2021 - link
OP's presentation could have been better, but I too wonder why AT has fallen off the GPU review cliff. I don't buy that it's lack of sourcing; their sister site has reviewed numerous NV 3k series cards. I miss good reviews, whether I could buy the cards or not. Prices went stupid a couple generations ago, but cards still got reviewed. AT reviewed GPUs (Ryan and Nate) far better IMO than any other reviewer I have seen; I just wish they still would.mode_13h - Sunday, August 15, 2021 - link
Complaints about lack of GPU reviews and deep dives are warranted, but a completely separate matter from their reporting of new card launches. While these product launch announcements are relatively low-value, they're also low-effort and tell me something I might not have otherwise noticed.As for the value of this card, I can tell you I've been in the position of having to spec GPUs for 2U rackmount machines with no riser card, and I definitely appreciate having this level of horsepower in a low-profile form factor and at their workstation price point. The chassis I mentioned didn't have the airflow needed for the passively-cooled cards, nor were those a good fit for our budget.