Video Performance

On the video side of things, we see a relatively standard array of formats and bit-rates. For 1080p video, one can choose between 30 and 60 FPS for 20 and 38 Mbps baseline H.264, respectively. There's also 4K DCI and 4K UHD video recording, which are at 24 and 30 FPS respectively. In the case of 4K DCI (4096x2160) it seems that the bit rate is at 62 Mbps while 4K UHD (3840x2160) is at 60 Mbps. Like both 1080p formats, this seems to be also encoded in H.264 baseline instead of high profile, which is a bit strange. The 720p120 format ends up being encoded as a 30fps file for 1/4th time slow motion, and uses 14 Mbps H.264 baseline.

In the case of 1080p30, quality is relatively good although there continues to be a great deal of noise present throughout the video. There isn't any obvious macroblocking though. The EIS performance is definitely a bit disappointing, as there really isn't much in the way of compensation for hand-shake or other unintended motion.

Similar to the 1080p30 sample, it's clear that the quality of the encoded video is quite good with relatively few obvious artifacts. Unfortunately, the sensor is being pushed a bit far here as the amount of noise present is significant. In addition, EIS seems to be completely absent here as it's pretty much impossible to see what's happening unless I'm standing still. Overall, quality should be great but  the Galaxy Note 4 and other phones with OIS will be much better for video.

Still Image Performance Software: CM11S
Comments Locked

148 Comments

View All Comments

  • wyewye - Thursday, November 20, 2014 - link

    An article beginning with "There's really not much else to be said" ...

    Why do you keep this smug asshole on your team, Anand? Are you really looking to drive away viewers?

    Regarding the OnePlus One, this config would have been decent in mid 2013. Coming in late 2014, this phone is not only not a flagship killer but average at best.
  • Harry_Wild - Thursday, November 20, 2014 - link

    "Reception, at least for T-Mobile US' band 4/AWS LTE is noticeably worse than most devices that I've tried. "

    I'm a T-Mobile user; and this above result sure makes me uneasy to even consider it as a purchase! Hopefully, One Plus, can find some way to fix the LTE for T-Mobile so it can be more clear!
  • Munna2002 - Friday, November 21, 2014 - link

    I'm a T Mobile user and haven't had issues with the OPO reception in the NYC metro area. LTE speeds are as fast as those observed with a Samsung S3 and S5.
  • littlebitstrouds - Thursday, November 20, 2014 - link

    The reason this phone is so popular isn't that it matches up perfectly with flagships, even though it does it's best job, but rather that for $350 off contract it allows you to finally have a near flagship phone on non-contract services without breaking your bank. I went from an EVO LTE with $99 a month from sprint, to $50 a month with t-mobile non contract. $50 savings a month, and I don't have to use last year's gear while doing it.
  • BabelHuber - Thursday, November 20, 2014 - link

    I do not understand why CM is criticized because of its options:

    I like them and I use them - for me a stock Android phone has too few options. I need to use Xposed/ Gravitybox to get the options back, otherwise I can't stand it.

    Also I do not understand what is wrong with CM's Theme Engine: It works well and there are lots of themes I really like.
    Of course there are also themes which do not work correctly one way or the other, but that's not the Theme Engine's fault.

    So I would see it exactly the other way round: CM adds sensible features to Android. Of course there are also lots of settings in CM which I don't use, like the profiles.
    But why should I be embarassed about this? I use what I want and I ignore the rest. That's what options are for.

    Also I didn't have difficulties getting used to CM at all.

    So I think from the software side Joshua Ho got it wrong.

    If I would be malicious I'd say it's no wonder that the Anandtech staff likes iOS so much, because they seem to be too stupid to use a fully-featured OS :-)
  • srkelley - Thursday, November 20, 2014 - link

    It's not that they're dumb, far from it, but that the presentation of the options can leave a lot to be desired. Joshua Ho points out the number, but the number of options alone isn't the real issue. It's too number made available to people that require them to either search outside of the ui to understand or to learn what they do through trial and error.

    I'm perfectly fine with that, I have a OPO (https://plus.google.com/+ShirondaleKelley/posts). Still, such a thing must be cited. Even power users just want to be users sometimes. Maybe they just want to exert their power through workflows instead of configuration. Maybe they want to be able to recommended a good phone to friends without becoming their personal and default support option. Having such a thing the review reminds you of what the norm is and allows for a much more comprehensive review. It's constructive criticism, not scalding or venomous criticism.

    Since we're all power users here, maybe we would still get to phone for our friends but decide to install miui or preconfigure certain items. A review like this certainly helps with the decision of what to recommend and how to handle it.
  • BabelHuber - Friday, November 21, 2014 - link

    In my experience, people like CM's options, even the 'regular' users.

    My GF uses CM11 on her Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.4 - I had to install it because she hates the Samsung-UI the device came with. With CM, she is satisfied with the device.

    I've also shown two friends how to install CM on their older devices (SGS2 and HTC Desire HD). They also like it.

    Nobody said that he/she is confused. Nobody wants to have less options.

    So I still think that CM is fine and I still do not understand how somebody would prefer less options. It just does not make sense to me.
  • srkelley - Sunday, November 23, 2014 - link

    Yes, and that's good for them.

    Again, it's not solely the number but in how they're presented. If it had a more cohesive, polished presentation then the number really wouldn't matter. The way that some part of the interface exposes (or doesn't) functionality is the true issue here.

    No, that doesn't mean that everyone will have trouble. I just don't believe that you should have search outside of a ui to understand how to complete basic and intermediate level items. That can be the cause with some of the cm11 functions. It's nowhere near all of them, it's something that I see the team fixing over time. It used to be way more daunting in the beginning, the team has been making great improvements while adding more functionality and I love it for that.
  • slfisher - Monday, November 24, 2014 - link

    Do you have a "CM for Dummies" reference to point to on how to configure it? thanks.
  • icekyuu - Monday, November 24, 2014 - link

    Try this - http://cornerplay.com/2014/08/05/cyanogenmod-onepl...

    For the record, I love CM's customization options.

    I vastly prefer the Google Camera app though. I suspect what happened is the reviewer got frustrated with the CM Camera app and that boiled over for everything else. When everything else is actually fine.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now